Kitchen Extraction and Fire-Safety Cleaning Schedules

Commercial kitchen extraction canopy over a cooking line being cleaned.

Kitchen Extraction and Fire-Safety Cleaning Schedules

Every commercial kitchen with a gas or high-heat cooking line builds up a layer of grease inside its extract ductwork, and that layer is fuel for a fire that travels above your ceilings where nobody can reach it. Cleaning it out on a schedule is not optional housekeeping — it is a fire-safety control the law expects you to manage, your insurer expects you to document, and a fire officer will ask to see certificates for. This guide sets out the cleaning schedules that actually apply: the TR19 Grease intervals by cooking hours (3, 6 or 12 months), the 200-micron measured trigger that overrides the calendar, the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 duty that sits underneath all of it, how ductwork access panels decide whether a clean is even possible, and exactly what to keep in your records so that after an incident your paperwork works for you and not against you.

Key Facts: Extraction Cleaning Schedules (UK, 2026)

  • TR19 Grease indicative intervals: heavy use (12–16 cooking hours/day) — every 3 months; moderate use (6–12 hours/day) — every 6 months; light use (2–6 hours/day) — every 12 months. TR19 Grease is an industry cleaning specification, not a statute, but it is the benchmark insurers and fire officers use.
  • The 200-micron trigger overrides the calendar: when the mean grease deposit through the system reaches 200 microns (a fifth of a millimetre), the system needs cleaning whatever the schedule says. High-grease menus reach it faster.
  • The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 makes a named “responsible person” legally accountable for fire safety — and a fire risk assessment that ignores the grease extract duct is not suitable and sufficient. This is the legal duty TR19 Grease cleaning satisfies in practice.
  • Grease duct fires are a leading hospitality fire-loss category: a flare-up at the canopy ignites the deposit layer, and the fire runs the full length of a steel duct through ceiling voids past your fire compartmentation in minutes.
  • No access panels = no compliant clean: a duct without inspection and access hatches at regular intervals cannot be cleaned along its full length. Contractors reach a few metres from each end and exclude the rest from the certificate — that exclusion zone stays dirty permanently.
  • A proper clean is the whole system: canopy plenum, filters and housings, every accessible metre of duct, the fan and impeller, and the discharge — not “canopy and a metre each way”.
  • Insurance: most commercial kitchen policies now carry a condition requiring TR19 Grease-compliant cleaning at usage-appropriate intervals, with certificates and photographic reports. After a duct fire, missing certificates are one of the most common grounds for a reduced or disputed claim.
  • Budget figures: professional duct cleaning typically £500–£1,500+ per visit depending on system size and access; canopy filter washing is an in-house daily/weekly job; annual extraction plant servicing (fans, belts, controls) £300–£600. All + VAT.

Extraction cleaning is the compliance job most operators under-do until an insurer or a fire officer forces the issue — usually because the grease that matters is out of sight. You can see the filters going brown, but the duct run above the ceiling, the fan on the roof and the plenum behind the canopy are hidden, and out of sight becomes out of schedule. This guide is about turning that hidden system into a managed one: a written cleaning schedule matched to how hard you actually cook, a competent contractor certifying the work, and a records file that proves it. Get those three things right and the fire risk drops, the insurance position strengthens, and the awkward inspection becomes a five-minute file check.

This guide is for operators, kitchen managers, landlords and facilities teams responsible for a commercial kitchen — whether you are setting a schedule for the first time, inheriting a site with no records, or being asked by an insurer to prove your cleaning regime. It is an educational compliance guide: Craven Cooling supplies and services the cooking equipment that sits under the canopy and generates the grease load, and our servicing team keeps that equipment maintained; for the specialist duct cleaning itself you engage a competent ventilation-hygiene contractor, and this guide tells you exactly what to demand of them.

Table of Contents
3 / 6 / 12
TR19 Grease indicative cleaning intervals in months — heavy (12–16 hr/day), moderate (6–12 hr/day) and light (2–6 hr/day) use
200 µm
Mean grease deposit at which the extract system needs cleaning regardless of the calendar
£500–£1,500
Typical + VAT cost of one professional duct clean, against a business-ending fire
🔥
The fire you can’t see coming
Airborne grease from every fryer, chargrill and wok condenses on the inside of your extract duct — filters, plenum, duct walls, fan blades, all of it. That layer is fuel. A flare-up at the canopy face is drawn straight into a loaded duct, ignites the deposit, and the fire travels a steel tube running above your ceilings, through voids, past the compartment walls that are supposed to contain it. Your extinguishers can’t reach it and your staff can’t see it. Fire services repeatedly identify uncleaned extract systems as a major cause of kitchen fires spreading beyond the kitchen. The prevention is not exotic: clean the duct on a schedule, keep the certificates, and treat the ductwork as part of your fire risk assessment — because the law already does.
3 mth
TR19 Grease interval for heavy-use kitchens cooking 12–16 hours a day

1. Why Grease in the Duct Is a Fire Risk, Not a Cleaning Job

It helps to reframe extraction cleaning from a hygiene task into what it actually is: fire-load management. The canopy filters catch the heavy grease, but a meaningful fraction passes through as fine aerosol and condenses on every internal surface downstream — the plenum behind the filters, the duct walls, every bend and riser, the impeller of the extract fan, and the discharge cowl on the roof. Over weeks and months that film thickens into a continuous coating of combustible residue lining the one part of the building specifically designed to carry hot air and flame away from the cooking line.

The danger is the combination: an ignition source (a flare-up on the chargrill, a chip-pan flash, a burner fault) meeting a fuel path (the grease layer) inside a spread route (the duct passing through ceilings, voids and compartment walls). A canopy fire that would be a contained incident in a clean system becomes, in a loaded one, a fire that runs the full length of the extract before anyone in the kitchen realises where it has gone. This is precisely why extraction cleaning has its own industry specification and sits under fire-safety law rather than food-hygiene rules — it is managed as a fire control, and the schedule is the control.

The three things a schedule controls: ignition — a well-maintained cooking line with fewer flare-ups; fuel — regular removal of the grease deposit before it builds to a continuous combustible layer; and spread — keeping the duct’s internal surfaces clean so a canopy incident stays a canopy incident. The cleaning schedule is where all three meet the diary.

2. TR19 Grease Cleaning Intervals by Cooking Hours

TR19 Grease is the UK building-engineering industry’s specification for cleaning grease-laden extract systems — the standard your contractor should certify against and the one your insurer means when they write “TR19” into a policy. Its headline output is a set of indicative cleaning intervals keyed to how many hours a day you cook, because cooking hours are the crude proxy for how fast grease accumulates.

Table: TR19 Grease Indicative Cleaning Intervals by Kitchen Usage
Usage level Cooking hours per day Indicative interval Typical operations
Heavy 12–16 hours Every 3 months Hotels, hospitals, all-day dining, fast food, dark kitchens running long shifts
Moderate 6–12 hours Every 6 months Most restaurants, gastropubs, school and workplace kitchens
Light 2–6 hours Every 12 months Cafés, small pubs with limited menus, function-only kitchens

Read these as starting points, not guarantees. The usage bands assume a broadly typical menu; two kitchens cooking the same hours can load their ducts at very different rates. A café frying breakfast for three hours can generate more grease than a lunch-only bistro doing gentle pan work over six, and a wood-fired pizzeria’s soot-and-grease mix behaves differently again. The honest way to set your interval is to start from the band that matches your hours, then let the first one or two cleans’ measurements tell you whether you need to go more or less often. The contractor’s deposit readings, not the catalogue band, are your real schedule.

Menu intensity, not just hours, sets the real interval

Two operations at the same “moderate, 6–12 hour” band can need very different schedules. A high-grease line — fried chicken, chargrilled meats, wok cooking, kebab grills — throws far more airborne grease than roasting and boiling, and reaches the 200-micron trigger months earlier. If your menu leans fried and grilled, assume you sit at the shorter end of your band or a step above it, and prove it with the first clean’s readings. When you change the cooking line, the interval changes with it — see the equipment side of this at cooking equipment or call 01792 732702.

3. The 200-Micron Test and What a Real Clean Includes

The intervals are indicative because TR19 Grease’s actual measure is not time — it is grease-layer thickness. A competent contractor uses a wet film thickness gauge at defined points through the system, and when the mean deposit reaches 200 microns — a fifth of a millimetre — the system requires cleaning, whether that took your chargrill three months or your café eighteen. The measurement is what converts “we clean twice a year” from a hopeful statement into an evidenced compliance position, and it is why the pre- and post-clean readings belong in your records.

Just as important is scope. A cheap “clean” that does the canopy face, swaps the filters and reaches a metre into the duct leaves the bulk of the fire load exactly where it was — and it produces a certificate that looks reassuring right up until a loss adjuster reads the small print. A proper TR19 Grease clean addresses the whole grease-bearing system.

Canopy & Plenum

The capture zone

  • Canopy interior and plenum chamber degreased
  • Grease filters cleaned or replaced
  • Filter housings and drain channels cleared
  • Where most visible grease sits — but not where the fire risk ends

Ductwork Run

The hidden fire path

  • Every accessible metre, not just the ends
  • Bends, risers and horizontal runs reached via access panels
  • Deposit measured before and after
  • Inaccessible sections logged on a schematic

Fan & Impeller

The choke point

  • Extract fan housing and impeller degreased
  • Grease on blades unbalances and slows the fan
  • A loaded impeller cuts airflow and raises risk
  • Often the dirtiest single component

Discharge & Certification

The proof

  • Roof cowl / discharge point cleaned
  • Certificate naming the TR19 Grease specification
  • Pre/post photographs at defined points
  • Schematic of any areas not accessed

When you commission a clean, ask three questions before you book: which specification will you certify against, what is included from canopy to discharge, and how will you evidence areas you can’t reach? A contractor who answers “TR19 Grease, full system, photographs and a schematic of exclusions” is selling you compliance. A quote that is markedly cheaper than the rest is almost always cheaper because it is doing less of the system — and the part it skips is the part that burns.


4. The Fire Safety Order 2005 — the Legal Duty Underneath

Cleaning schedules are industry practice; the legal obligation they satisfy is the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the fire-safety law for virtually all non-domestic premises in England and Wales. It replaced fire certificates with a self-assessment regime built around one figure: the responsible person — usually the employer or whoever controls the premises — who must carry out and maintain a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment and keep the resulting fire precautions in place.

The Order never mentions “extraction”. It doesn’t have to. The fire risk assessment must identify significant fire hazards and the people at risk, and a grease extract system is an ignition point, a fuel load and a spread route rolled into one — so an assessment for a catering premises that says nothing about the duct’s condition, its cleaning regime and its route through the building is not suitable and sufficient. That is the legal hook: your TR19 Grease cleaning schedule is one of the “general fire precautions” the Order requires you to maintain, and your certificates are the evidence you are maintaining it. Enforcement sits with the local fire and rescue authority, which can inspect, serve enforcement and prohibition notices — up to closing the kitchen — and prosecute, with serious breaches carrying unlimited fines.

Three practical moves discharge the duty cleanly: name the responsible person in writing; commission a fire risk assessment that explicitly covers the extract system and review it whenever the cooking line or building changes; and treat the cleaning schedule as a maintained control with a paper trail, not a favour you do the building when someone remembers. In leased premises, settle in writing who controls the duct that runs through the landlord’s voids carrying the operator’s grease — the unwritten split is the one that unravels after an incident.


5. Access Panels — No Access, No Clean, No Compliance

The single most common reason a kitchen cannot achieve a compliant clean is not budget or laziness — it is that the duct was never built to be cleaned. TR19 Grease and the underlying design practice call for inspection and access hatches at regular intervals along the whole run, at every bend and riser, so a contractor can physically reach and mechanically clean the internal surface end to end. Where those panels are missing, the contractor cleans as far as they can reach from each open end and formally excludes the rest — and that excluded middle stays coated in grease indefinitely, a permanent fire load with a certificate that quietly admits it was never touched.

1
Ask the one question before you take on a site

“Can every metre of this extract run be physically reached for cleaning?” If the answer is no, you are inheriting a permanent exclusion zone and a compliance problem that predates you. Get it surveyed before you sign.

2
Get a schematic of access and exclusions

A competent contractor’s report should include a drawing showing where access exists, where it doesn’t, and which sections were therefore not cleaned. That schematic is your action plan and your evidence of honesty.

3
Retrofit access panels to close the gaps

Fitting additional access hatches typically costs hundreds of pounds — trivial against a fire that started in the one section nobody could clean. Prioritise horizontal runs and the fan, where grease sits heaviest.

4
Re-clean the newly accessible sections

Once panels are in, book the clean that finally reaches the excluded zone. Only then does your certificate cover the whole system — and only then is your fire risk assessment honestly satisfied.


6. Insurance and the Real Cost of Getting It Wrong

Insurers underwrite commercial kitchens on the assumption that the extract system is cleaned to TR19 Grease by a competent contractor, and most policies now say so — as a condition or warranty requiring cleaning at usage-appropriate intervals, documented. After a fire the loss adjuster’s opening requests are entirely predictable: the fire risk assessment, the gas safety records, and the duct cleaning certificates with their photographic reports. An operator who can produce a consistent run of TR19 Grease certificates matching their usage band is negotiating from strength. One who can’t is negotiating from underneath, and a reduced or refused settlement on a kitchen fire is frequently a business-ending event.

Worked Example: Moderate-Use Gastropub — Annual Extraction Cleaning Budget

TR19 Grease duct cleans, 2 × per year (6-month interval)£1,400 + VAT
Canopy filter washing (in-house, weekly, labour + chemicals)£280 + VAT
Extraction plant service — fan, belts, controls, balancing£400 + VAT
Fire risk assessment review (extraction section, annual)£250 + VAT
Access panel retrofit (one-off, amortised over 5 years)£120 + VAT/yr
Total: ~£2,450 + VAT per year — typically well under 0.5% of turnover, and the difference between a paid claim and a disputed one

Two points that quietly matter. First, tell your insurer what you actually cook: a policy priced for a “restaurant” that is really a high-volume fried-chicken operation on annual cleaning is a misrepresentation problem stacked on top of a fire problem, and both surface at claim time. Second, when the cooking line changes, the change ripples through your extract load, your cleaning frequency, your fire risk assessment and your premium at once — make the calls before the equipment lands, not after the incident.


7. Choosing a Competent Contractor

Extraction cleaning is unregulated as a trade, which means the quality range is enormous — from specialists who measure, photograph and certify to a specification, down to a van with a pressure washer and a template certificate. Because the certificate is worthless if the work behind it wasn’t done, vetting the contractor is part of the compliance job, not an afterthought.

  • They certify to TR19 Grease by name
    Not “deep clean” or “steam clean” — the certificate should name the specification, because that is the word your insurer and fire officer recognise.
  • They measure deposit before and after
    Wet film gauge readings at defined points, on the report. Measurement is the difference between compliance and a hopeful guess.
  • They photograph pre- and post-clean at defined locations
    Time-stamped images of the same points before and after are the evidence a loss adjuster actually looks at.
  • They provide a schematic of inaccessible areas
    An honest contractor tells you what they couldn’t reach and recommends the access panels to fix it — rather than quietly certifying the whole system as done.
  • They carry appropriate insurance and can evidence competence
    Working at height, in voids and on roofs. Ask for their own liability cover and evidence of trained, competent operatives.
  • The quote covers the whole system, in writing
    Canopy, plenum, filters, full duct run, fan and discharge — itemised. A quote that is vague on scope is vague because the scope is small.

8. Your Cleaning Records File — What to Keep, Forever

Extraction fire safety comes down, in the end, to a folder. One place — physical or digital — holding the documents that answer the fire officer, the insurer and the landlord in a single flick through. Keep it current, keep everything, and never discard old certificates: the value is in the unbroken run of history that proves a regime rather than a one-off tidy-up.

1
The written cleaning schedule

Your stated interval, the usage band it comes from, and the reasoning (hours cooked, menu intensity, first-clean readings). This is the plan the certificates prove you are following.

2
Every TR19 Grease certificate and report

Certificate, pre/post photographs, deposit measurements, the inaccessible-area schematic, and the remedial recommendations with your evidence of acting on them. The full run, oldest to newest.

3
The fire risk assessment

Current version, explicitly covering the extract system, with the named responsible person and the review log. Reviewed after any change to equipment, menu intensity or building layout.

4
In-house canopy cleaning log

Filter washing frequency, canopy wipe-downs and visual duct checks — dated and initialled. The daily discipline at the canopy stretches the professional interval and shows a working safety culture.

5
Extraction plant service records

Fan, belts, controls and airflow balancing, serviced and dated. A fan that isn’t pulling design airflow lets grease drop out and load the duct faster.

6
Cooking equipment servicing records

The line under the canopy needs maintaining too — burners burning clean, thermostats accurate, fewer flare-ups. Craven Cooling’s servicing team covers the catering-equipment side, with records that slot straight into this file.

Where Craven Cooling fits

We don’t clean ducts — we supply and service what cooks under them, and that cooking line is what sets your grease load. When you’re specifying a new line or swapping equipment, we’ll tell you what the change means for your extraction demand and cleaning frequency before you commit, and our servicing page covers planned maintenance on the equipment itself. We stock or source the full commercial cooking range — call 01792 732702 or email [email protected].
Planning a Cooking Line — or Changing One?
Family-run, Swansea showroom, 2-year parts warranty across UK & Ireland. Tell us what you’re cooking and we’ll spec equipment your extraction can actually handle — and flag early when a menu change will shorten your cleaning schedule.
Browse Catering Equipment
Call Sales — 01792 732702
In Summary

UK kitchen extraction cleaning is fire-load management with a paper trail. TR19 Grease — an industry cleaning specification, not a statute — sets indicative intervals of every 3 months for heavy use (12–16 cooking hours/day), 6 months for moderate (6–12 hours) and 12 months for light (2–6 hours), but the real trigger is a measured mean grease deposit of 200 microns, which high-grease menus reach faster. A compliant clean covers the whole system — canopy, plenum, filters, every accessible metre of duct, the fan and impeller, and the discharge — certified to TR19 Grease with pre/post photographs, deposit readings and a schematic of any inaccessible sections. Access panels decide whether that clean is even possible; without them the middle of the duct stays permanently coated. The legal duty underneath is the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005: a named responsible person must hold a fire risk assessment that explicitly covers the extract duct, and the cleaning schedule is one of the fire precautions the Order requires maintained. Insurers convert TR19 Grease intervals into policy conditions, and missing certificates are a common route to a disputed claim after a duct fire — budget roughly £2,450 + VAT a year for a moderate-use site. Vet the contractor for measurement, photographs and honest exclusion schematics, and keep every record forever. Craven Cooling supplies and services the cooking equipment that sets your grease load — Swansea showroom, 2-year parts warranty: 01792 732702, [email protected].

Frequently Asked Questions

No statute names a frequency. The law — the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 — requires the responsible person to manage fire risk, and TR19 Grease is the industry specification that defines what adequate grease management looks like: indicatively every 3 months at heavy use (12–16 cooking hours a day), every 6 months at moderate use (6–12 hours) and every 12 months at light use (2–6 hours). The overriding test is measured deposit — a mean grease layer of 200 microns means the system needs cleaning whatever the calendar says. High-grease menus reach that trigger faster than the indicative interval. In practice your insurer usually converts these intervals into a policy condition, at which point they stop being advisory.
Not in itself — TR19 Grease is an industry cleaning specification, not a piece of legislation. What is law is the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, which requires the responsible person to assess and control fire risk, and grease-laden extract ductwork is one of the most significant hidden fire risks in a catering building. TR19 Grease is simply the recognised benchmark for what “adequate cleaning” means, so fire officers, fire risk assessors and insurers all measure your regime against it. Cleaning to TR19 Grease, on a schedule, with certificates, is how you demonstrate you have discharged the legal duty. Departing from it leaves you having to prove some other adequate method, which in practice nobody accepts.
It is the measured thickness of the grease layer on the inside of your extract system — 200 microns is a fifth of a millimetre, a thin but continuous combustible film. A competent contractor measures the deposit at defined points through the system with a wet film thickness gauge, and when the mean reading reaches 200 microns the system is due for cleaning regardless of how long it has been since the last clean. This is why the calendar intervals are only indicative: the deposit is the real test. It also gives you objective evidence — the pre-clean readings show why the clean was needed and the post-clean readings show the system was returned to a sound condition, both of which belong in your records.
You can and should handle the canopy level in-house: washing grease filters weekly (or more under heavy grilling), wiping down the canopy interior and plenum, and visually checking what you can see. That discipline genuinely slows duct loading and stretches the professional interval. But the duct run itself is a different job — it needs access equipment, mechanical cleaning, deposit measurement with a wet film gauge, and the part you can’t self-supply: independent certification to TR19 Grease with photographic evidence. An insurer or fire officer won’t accept “we did it ourselves” for the duct, because there’s no verifiable proof of standard. The economics are clear: in-house filter care costs a few hours of labour a month; a professional duct clean at £500–£1,500 + VAT protects a claim potentially worth the whole business.
Then the duct cannot be fully cleaned. A contractor reaches only a few metres from each open end and formally excludes the middle from the certificate — and that excluded section stays coated in grease indefinitely, a permanent fire load. The certificate will say so if the contractor is honest, and that admission is exactly what a loss adjuster looks for after a fire. The fix is to retrofit access hatches at regular intervals along the run and at every bend and riser, which typically costs a few hundred pounds, then re-clean so the whole system is finally covered. Before taking on any premises, ask whether every metre of the extract run can be physically reached — discovering mid-claim that most of your duct was never cleanable is the worst possible time to find out.
They can, and it is one of the most common grounds for a reduced or disputed settlement after a kitchen fire. Most commercial kitchen policies now carry a condition or warranty requiring TR19 Grease-compliant cleaning at intervals appropriate to your usage, with documentation. If the fire started in or spread through a grease-loaded duct and you can’t produce a consistent run of certificates matching your cooking level, the insurer argues you breached the policy condition and the loss was a foreseeable consequence. Operators with a clean, complete file are in a strong position; those with gaps, unremediated exclusion zones or nothing at all are negotiating from underneath. Keeping the certificates is cheap; being uninsured on a kitchen fire is not.
Yes. TR19 Grease intervals follow grease load, and grease load follows what you cook. Move from roasting and boiling to a fried and chargrilled line and you throw far more airborne grease, so the 200-micron trigger arrives sooner and your cleaning cycle shortens — a kitchen that was fine on annual cleaning may now need it every six or three months. The change also flows into your fire risk assessment (the Fire Safety Order 2005 requires it to be reviewed when circumstances change) and into your insurance, which was priced on your declared cooking style. Before the new equipment lands, reset the cleaning schedule, update the assessment and inform the insurer. When you’re specifying that change, Craven Cooling will flag the extraction and grease-load implications — ask when you call.
It depends on who controls each part, and it is the classic extraction trap. Under the Fire Safety Order 2005 the duty attaches to whoever has control — so the operator typically controls the kitchen and generates the grease, while the landlord may own the duct run through the building’s ceiling voids and risers and the fan on the roof. Both parties hold duties over the parts they control and must cooperate and coordinate. The arrangement that unravels after a fire is the one nobody wrote down. Resolve it in the lease or a side agreement: who commissions and pays for the TR19 Grease cleans, who holds the certificates, who maintains the roof fan, and who retrofits access panels. Get it in writing before there’s an incident to argue over.